International Comparison
1.
Curriculum
Content
The Curriculum content in Brazil and in the USA, can be
defined by the meso level of education, meaning the States and schools. However,
different from the USA, Brazil has National Guidelines which should be followed
by the meso and micro level.
2.
Assessment and
Qualifications
Child Education in Brazil and Early Childhood in the USA don’t
have specific guidelines about assessments, but in both countries, there is a
suggestion to keep track of the children development.
In Primary and Secondary education there are mandatory high-stakes
tests in both countries used for checking the educational quality of schools.
During the learning processes in both countries the meso and the micro level
can decide which type of assessment to use to evaluate the students’ learning
(INEP, 2017; Texas Education Agency,2017).
In Brazil at the Higher Education level there is also a
high-stakes test to evaluate quality (INEP, 2017). And in the USA the
institutions must follow guidelines from accreditation agencies. There is
nothing determined in both countries concerning assessments during the courses.
Regarding qualifications, overall both countries have the
same accreditations, except in Higher Education, when in the USA there are more
paths determined by the type of study.
3.
National
Framework
The National Framework in the USA in general is the same as
in Brazil, the starting age in Child Education and in Primary are the same, for
example. However, in the USA there are more path possibilities during Primary
and Secondary Education and in Higher Education usually during the first few years’
courses are broader (Retrieved from http://aestudyabroad.com/us-education-system/gat/), while in Brazil they are already
connected to a specific degree one is pursuing (BRASIL, 1996).
Both countries have public and private schools, but in the
USA Homeschooling is also a possibility, as in Brazil this is still an illegal
practice, although in the last couple years the justice system is allowing
parents to homeschool their children in Brazil.
4.
Inspection
In Brazil, all States and institutions in all educational
levels that receive the government’s money must make a yearly audit to be
submitted to the government (Brasil, 2011). Likewise, the same happens in the
USA, however in this case independent auditors are responsible for this task.
5.
Pedagogy and
Didactics
In terms of Child, Primary and
Secondary Education in the USA and in Brazil, there are almost no guidelines
concerning this topic. In the USA the teachers are told to use the best
pedagogical practices and in Brazil they have recommended material and
textbooks, and must create an Annual Lesson Plan that has to be approved by the
school’s principal and then submitted to the State or Municipal Secretariat.
Concerning Higher Education in both countries teachers are free to decide how
to teach.
6.
Special Needs
Education
The main difference concerning this topic in the two
countries is the inclusion of students with cognitive disabilities and high
abilities in the special needs category in Brazil. Furthermore, in the USA
there is an age limit to attend schools while in Brazil there is no age limit
for these students.
7.
Language
Minorities, Migrants, and Minority Students
Contrary to Brazil that has only a
few National guidelines concerning language minorities and minority students,
the USA, in this specific case Texas, has a structured program defined by a state
mandate to assure the integration of these minorities, including migrants
(Texas Education Agency, 2017). The Brazilian law does not any guidelines
concerning specifically migrants.
However, in Higher Education, Brazil
has a quota system to ensure more equity in the access to education (BRASIL,
1996), while there is no formal law concerning this in the USA.
8.
Professional
Development
Teachers’ professional development in the USA is regulated by
a state law, while in Brazil this is a centralized national law. A specific
degree is required in both countries to teach from Child Education to Secondary
Education, but in Brazil it is a Secondary Education degree and in the USA an
undergraduate degree (Texas Education Agency, 2017; BRASIL, 1996). Concerning
Higher Education in public Universities, while in Texas the requirement is a Ph.D.
degree, in Brazil most starting teaching positions only require a Master’s
degree.
9.
Institutional
Development
Comparing Institutional Development initiatives, USA’s policies
No Child Left Behind Act and Race to the Top could be considered the main
concerns of the country, while in Brazil the National Plan for Education includes
20 different topics that are then divided in diverse initiatives, concerning
almost everything that influences education (enrollment rates, retention rates,
drop-out rates, teacher education, funding, special needs education,
professional education and others) (Lima,2015). It is very good that Brazil has
a broad overview of what needs to be improved in its’ educational system, but
also it is a big challenge to fulfill all of the goals in just 10 years, what
has been causing some issues, specially concerning funding availability to
tackle all of the goals defined.
10. Institutional Forms and Structure
There are no laws in both countries concerning the size of classrooms
and the number of students, but there are suggestions: in Child Education and
Primary Education 11 students per teacher in the USA and in Brazil 13 students
in Child Education and 22 in Primary Education. As for Secondary Education the
numbers suggested are very different, 30 students in Brazil and 20 in the USA
(Texas Education Agency, 2017). This is a known issue in Brazil, because since
there is no inspection on this, classes in the Secondary sometimes have 60 students.
Having a type of control over this, like in Texas, where you should inform the
school district could be very beneficial to Brazil’s education.
11. Allied Social Measures
While in Texas, there is limited information about allied
social measures (Texas Education Agency, 2017), in Brazil 10 different programs
are in place to support education (Retrieved October 26, 2017, from http://www.fnde.gov.br/programas). This is surely due to the country’s
social development situation, where basic human needs infrastructure is still
not met for everyone.
12. Funding
As for funding, in Brazil states and municipalities must
apply at least 25% of their revenue resulting from taxes in education and the
national government must apply at least 18% (do Brasil, 1998). In the USA, all
levels are also responsible for funding education, but there was no information
concerning a fixed amount that must be invested by each level (Texas Education
Agency, 2017).
13. Governance
Both countries give a good amount of autonomy to its’
states, municipalities and schools, however some guidelines must be followed by
every level and in general the micro level and schools have to provide information
regarding the measures taken in practice.
14. Results of Recent International Assessments
When it comes to the results of the 2015 PISA Brazil had
very low scores in all 3 main areas assessed, while the USA had a low score in
Math, but still close to the average score, and above the average scores in
Science and Reading (Retrieved November 22, 2017, from http://uk.businessinsider.com/pisa-worldwide-ranking-of-math-science-reading-skills-2016-12?r=US&IR=T ).
15. School Failure and Dropout Rates
There were no
data concerning school failure in the USA, while in Brazil the Failure rate in
primary is 17,3% and in secondary 12%. The Dropout rates in Brazil are 4% in
primary education and 6,6% in secondary (Retrieved
October 26, 2017, from http://www.inep.gov.br/), while in Texas these are lower 2,4% in primary education and 1,4% in secondary (Texas Education Agency, 2017).
16. Accountability Arrangements
In Brazil, INEP
is the institution responsible for assuring educational quality in Brazil.
There are evaluations in all levels to check students’ performance and an index
called IDEB that is created from the evaluation scores and the failure and dropout
rates (Saviani, 2010). In Texas that are 5 different Indexes that look not only
at students’ performance, but also at their progress, the progress of
disadvantages students and their readiness to postsecondary education (Texas Education Agency, 2017).
17. Selection and Gatekeeping
No explicit rules in both countries regulate students’
retention, except for the state exam taken in the USA. However, in Brazil
students usually have at least 3 exams for each subject every year in which
they have to succeed to continue progressing.
Regarding the access to Higher Education, Brazil has a
National exam and its score is the only criteria taken into consideration to
enter a public university. Some universities have their own exam too and its
score is also the only criteria to enter the university. Similarly, the USA
also have a National exam, SAT, and the score is taken into consideration
together with the student GPA to define if the student can access the
university.
References
BRASIL, L. (1996).
9394/96. Estabelece as Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional.
Brasília.
BRASIL, L. (2011). 12527/11. Regula o acesso as informações. Brasília.
BRASIL, L. (2011). 12527/11. Regula o acesso as informações. Brasília.
do Brasil, G. F.
(1988). Constituição da república Federativa do Brasil. Brasília,
Senado Federal.
FNDE. (2017). Fnde.gov.br.
Retrieved 26 October 2017, from http://fnde.gov.br
INEP. (2017). Inep.gov.br.
Retrieved 26 October 2017, from http://inep.gov.br
Lima, K. (2015). Plano Nacional de Educação 2014-2024. Educação, 2014, 2024.
Lima, K. (2015). Plano Nacional de Educação 2014-2024. Educação, 2014, 2024.
Saviani, D. (2010).
Sistema nacional de educação articulado ao plano nacional de educação. Revista
Brasileira de Educação, 15(44).
Texas Education Agency. 2017. Retrieved
October 26, 2017, from https://tea.texas.gov/.
Comments
Post a Comment